Tensions in State-Local Intergovernmental Response to Emergencies: The Case of COVID-19

Preemption
Intergovernmental affairs
Emergency management

Bruce D. McDonald, III, Christopher B. Goodman, and Megan E. Hatch, (2020). “State Tensions in State-Local Intergovernmental Response to Emergencies: The Case of COVID-19,” State and Local Government Review 52 (3): 186-194, doi: 10.1177/0160323X20979826

Authors
Affiliations

North Carolina State University

Northern Illinois University

Cleveland State University

Published

September 2020

Doi

Abstract

The U.S. emergency and disaster response system is designed to operate bottom-up, meaning responses are intended to begin at the local level with state and federal governments stepping in to assist as needed. The response to the current COVID-19 outbreak, however, has been something else entirely, as each level of government competes with the others over resources and authority. Some states preferred a local response with state support, while other states took a more uniform, state-mandated response enabled by state preemption of local actions. The latter has revealed an often-dormant means of state preemption of local ordinances: the executive order preemption. Local government managers will have to be creative in balancing responsiveness to their constituents in this time of crisis while also being constrained by their states. The administrative choices are likely to have both immediate and long-term consequences for future emergencies.

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@article{mcdonald2020,
  author = {{Bruce D. McDonald, III} and {Christopher B. Goodman} and
    {Megan E. Hatch}},
  title = {Tensions in State-Local Intergovernmental Response to
    Emergencies: The Case of {COVID-19}},
  journal = {State \& Local Government Review},
  volume = {52},
  number = {3},
  pages = {186 - 194},
  date = {2020},
  url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0160323X20979826},
  doi = {10.1177/0160323X20979826},
  langid = {en}
}